When I went to a restaurant in the US in October, my order was for curry rice.
The chef explained that curry rice was an Indian food with lots of spices and had a spicy flavor, which he didn’t like.
“We were trying to create something that wasn’t as spicy and more of a curry-like flavor,” he said.
The dish had a lot of spicy elements, and I felt it was lacking in other parts of the menu.
When I got to the restaurant, I found a menu with the same dish, and the owner said I could choose from a whole range of options.
I decided to order curry rice with all the spices.
I also decided to serve it with a side of rice, and it was very satisfying.
I’m a big fan of Indian food and I loved that the dish was so flavorful and simple, so I decided that I would share my experience with other Americans who were considering trying it.
The restaurant, however, wasn’t serving curry rice on the menu at all.
Instead, they were serving rice that was made with rice hulls from the southern state of Kerala.
The hulls are a type of rice that is typically grown on the Indian coast of India and is often used in a variety of dishes like soups and stews.
“Curry rice isn’t really a part of the standard Indian food.
It’s something you can’t really find in the South Asian food chain,” said the restaurant owner, who did not want to be named because he was unsure how much curry rice he could serve.
“It’s really hard to find it in a restaurant and we don’t have it on our menu,” he told me.
“If I had made it with rice from Kerala, it would have been very special.”
A curry rice bowl is shown at a restaurant on the Kerala coast.
source The restaurant owner’s statement was echoed by other American diners.
“This is just a very odd situation,” one American told me, explaining that the curry rice wasn’t available on the American menu and it didn’t seem like it was on the list of ingredients that had to be included on the restaurant’s menu.
“The only thing that is included in the menu is rice hull,” another American said.
“So it is not something that I’m going to have in my dinner at home,” said another.
“You can’t just say ‘I don’t want curry rice.’
I’m not sure why this is being thrown around,” a third American said, noting that the restaurant did not seem to want to make the dish.
“That is so wrong,” one of the American diniers said.
A few other American and Canadian diners shared similar concerns.
“They are so busy making rice and they are so focused on that,” one person told me after eating a curry rice dish.
But other diners also seemed to have mixed feelings about the situation.
“I can’t believe they’re doing this to curry rice,” one diner told me over lunch.
“Not to mention that it’s a pretty basic thing for people to make and I don and don’t see why they’re even making it,” said a person who had ordered curry rice and who didn’t want to give her name.
“Just because I can’t find curry rice at home doesn’t mean I can make it,” a woman who had also ordered curry, said.
But some Americans also shared the restaurant owners’ frustration with the menu listing.
“There’s a lot more curry rice than is actually on the plate,” one man said.
Some diners were disappointed by the menu, which showed a large portion of curry rice without curry or rice hull.
“At least we’re going to get something on the table, right?” another person told The Jerusalem Times.
“How about some curry rice?” one person said.
Many diners, however are disappointed by a lack of curry in the restaurant menu.
The Indian restaurant owner told me that he’s had to close down the restaurant because the curry was not available on their menu.
But he says he’s also received a lot positive feedback about the menu from people who tried it and didn’t order anything.
“People are so excited about the curry,” he explained.
“Most people want to eat curry.”
This story was originally published by The Jerusalem Project and was republished with permission.